The following summarize reasons to deconstruct and reuse. [Click to jump to the appropriate section on this page.]
Preservation of Culture and Heritage
Economic Value and Job Creation
Deconstruction and material reuse is a major tool to meet environmental goals related to waste reduction, carbon mitigation, and building a green workforce - but it's also incredibly vital for the health and safety of our communities and natural ecosystems. Note that the below descriptions are courtesy of Stephanie Phillips, Deconstruction & Circular Economy Program Manager at City of San Antonio Office of Historic Preservation.
Demolition generates an array of environmental hazards, from airborne dust and particulate matter to the release of harmful substances like asbestos and lead. These pollutants can have severe health consequences for nearby residents, construction workers, and the surrounding ecosystem.
The practice of pre-demolition walkthroughs and deconstruction as opposed to demolition can reduce the proliferation of these hazards.
Air pollution resulting from demolition activities poses a significant risk to respiratory health. Fine particles and airborne toxins can enter the lungs and exacerbate existing conditions such as asthma and chronic respiratory diseases. These conditions are further exacerbated when air quality is already at unsafe levels due to pollution, wildfire smoke, and extreme heat.
The noise and vibrations associated with demolition can disrupt communities and negatively impact mental health. Prolonged exposure to excessive noise levels can lead to stress, anxiety, and even cardiovascular issues. Demolition happens to people as much as it happens to buildings!
Demolition activities can also contribute to water contamination, as hazardous materials seep into the soil and nearby water sources. Polluted water can affect local ecosystems and, in some cases, even contaminate drinking water supplies.
For more information on the health effects of demolitions, refer to the following article by deconstruction and reuse consultant Sara Badiali: http://www.reclamationadministration.com/2016/07/22/deconstruction-vs-demolition-portland-oregons-potential-for-groundbreaking-health-and-safety-studies-in-building-demolition-by-sara-badiali/
For a case study on demolitions and their health impacts in New York City, refer to the below paper by Emile Bensedrine (graduate of the Cornell University Urban and Regional Studies program; intern at the Christopherson Center).
Bensedrine SCCCP C&D paper.pdf (15.84 MB)
There have not been studies linking the EPA's Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool to the prevalence of demolition projects; however, a number of the indicators it measures may be linked to demolition impacts.
https://ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper/
Reuse and repair of existing buildings preserves the fabric and culture heritage of a community. It can enable the continued habitation and use by a socioeconomic group who has been in the area for a long time, and maintain structures of historic significance. By helping residents repair existing housing through the availability of low cost, salvaged materials from similar structures, it can be a counter weight to the pressures of gentrification. Helping residents stay in their homes preserves cultural ties through proximity and continued social relationships.
For more details on how deconstruction and material reuse can contribute to historic preservation, check out the report from the City of San Antonio and PlaceEconomics report: Treasure in the Walls.
For more on preservation, visit the National Trust for Historic Preservation webpage.
According to architect and researcher Brad Guy, between 2008 and 2022, the deconstruction and reuse sector tripled to about $1.4 billion. The sector now employs about 14,500 people annually.
Older buildings may be comprised of materials with great economic value. For example, the dense, high-quality, old-growth wood that many of New York City's older buildings are made of can no longer be purchased new.
Link to more info: https://domicology.msu.edu/upload/Harvesting%20New%20York%20City%20Old%20Growth%20Urban%20Forestry%20Bergsagel.pdf
Case Studies:
The LEEDv4.1 BD+C New Construction credit awards up to 5 points for adaptive reuse projects, and up to 4 points for new construction projects that incorporate reclaimed materials in the building structure and enclosure. In reality, this has not been enough to push the majority of LEED projects to reuse. However, networks such as All for Reuse have advocating that the upcoming version of the standard LEEDv5 place a greater emphasis on reuse.
The following is a breakdown of US construction and demolition (C&D) waste and building material reuse statistics, according to architect and researcher Brad Guy.
2022 | 2008 | |
Number of building demolitions | 310,000 | 270,000 (as of 2003) |
Annual C&D waste generated | 190 million tons | 164 million tons (as of 2003) |
Number of building material reuse stores | 1,500 | 1,500 |
Tons of building materials reused | 1.15 million tons | 350,000 |
Building Material Reuse (BMR) annual revenue | $2 billion | $700 million |
Jobs - Full Time Equivalent (FTE) | 16,500 | 8,250 |
Additional notes:
More to come with the upcoming release of Build Reuse's "Community Toolkit" report / tool!
For a visual representation of the materials that come from demolition:
Building deconstruction and reuse can be a strategy for disaster debris management. Below are several EPA resources on this topic.
EPA - Creating Disaster-Resilient Buildings to Minimize Disaster Debris (2024)
EPA - Resiliency and Natural Disaster Debris Workshop Final Summary Report (2022)
EPA - Sustainable Materials Management (SMM) Web Academy Webinar: After Disaster - Deconstruction, Rebuilding and Resilience Lessons from Hurricanes Katrina and Irene Webinar (2020)
Reuse increases materials lifespans, reduces dependency on scarce or non-renewable resources, reduces the amount of new procurement needed in building projects, and thereby can make construction projects less vulnerable to supply chain disruptions.
Reuse, especially when implemented at a local level, has the potential to make building materials more affordable.
Resources:
The following summarize reasons to deconstruct and reuse. [Click to jump to the appropriate section on this page.]
Preservation of Culture and Heritage
Economic Value and Job Creation
Deconstruction and material reuse is a major tool to meet environmental goals related to waste reduction, carbon mitigation, and building a green workforce - but it's also incredibly vital for the health and safety of our communities and natural ecosystems. Note that the below descriptions are courtesy of Stephanie Phillips, Deconstruction & Circular Economy Program Manager at City of San Antonio Office of Historic Preservation.
Demolition generates an array of environmental hazards, from airborne dust and particulate matter to the release of harmful substances like asbestos and lead. These pollutants can have severe health consequences for nearby residents, construction workers, and the surrounding ecosystem.
The practice of pre-demolition walkthroughs and deconstruction as opposed to demolition can reduce the proliferation of these hazards.
Air pollution resulting from demolition activities poses a significant risk to respiratory health. Fine particles and airborne toxins can enter the lungs and exacerbate existing conditions such as asthma and chronic respiratory diseases. These conditions are further exacerbated when air quality is already at unsafe levels due to pollution, wildfire smoke, and extreme heat.
The noise and vibrations associated with demolition can disrupt communities and negatively impact mental health. Prolonged exposure to excessive noise levels can lead to stress, anxiety, and even cardiovascular issues. Demolition happens to people as much as it happens to buildings!
Demolition activities can also contribute to water contamination, as hazardous materials seep into the soil and nearby water sources. Polluted water can affect local ecosystems and, in some cases, even contaminate drinking water supplies.
For more information on the health effects of demolitions, refer to the following article by deconstruction and reuse consultant Sara Badiali: http://www.reclamationadministration.com/2016/07/22/deconstruction-vs-demolition-portland-oregons-potential-for-groundbreaking-health-and-safety-studies-in-building-demolition-by-sara-badiali/
For a case study on demolitions and their health impacts in New York City, refer to the below paper by Emile Bensedrine (graduate of the Cornell University Urban and Regional Studies program; intern at the Christopherson Center).
Bensedrine SCCCP C&D paper.pdf (15.84 MB)
There have not been studies linking the EPA's Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool to the prevalence of demolition projects; however, a number of the indicators it measures may be linked to demolition impacts.
https://ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper/
Reuse and repair of existing buildings preserves the fabric and culture heritage of a community. It can enable the continued habitation and use by a socioeconomic group who has been in the area for a long time, and maintain structures of historic significance. By helping residents repair existing housing through the availability of low cost, salvaged materials from similar structures, it can be a counter weight to the pressures of gentrification. Helping residents stay in their homes preserves cultural ties through proximity and continued social relationships.
For more details on how deconstruction and material reuse can contribute to historic preservation, check out the report from the City of San Antonio and PlaceEconomics report: Treasure in the Walls.
For more on preservation, visit the National Trust for Historic Preservation webpage.
According to architect and researcher Brad Guy, between 2008 and 2022, the deconstruction and reuse sector tripled to about $1.4 billion. The sector now employs about 14,500 people annually.
Older buildings may be comprised of materials with great economic value. For example, the dense, high-quality, old-growth wood that many of New York City's older buildings are made of can no longer be purchased new.
Link to more info: https://domicology.msu.edu/upload/Harvesting%20New%20York%20City%20Old%20Growth%20Urban%20Forestry%20Bergsagel.pdf
Case Studies:
The LEEDv4.1 BD+C New Construction credit awards up to 5 points for adaptive reuse projects, and up to 4 points for new construction projects that incorporate reclaimed materials in the building structure and enclosure. In reality, this has not been enough to push the majority of LEED projects to reuse. However, networks such as All for Reuse have advocating that the upcoming version of the standard LEEDv5 place a greater emphasis on reuse.
The following is a breakdown of US construction and demolition (C&D) waste and building material reuse statistics, according to architect and researcher Brad Guy.
2022 | 2008 | |
Number of building demolitions | 310,000 | 270,000 (as of 2003) |
Annual C&D waste generated | 190 million tons | 164 million tons (as of 2003) |
Number of building material reuse stores | 1,500 | 1,500 |
Tons of building materials reused | 1.15 million tons | 350,000 |
Building Material Reuse (BMR) annual revenue | $2 billion | $700 million |
Jobs - Full Time Equivalent (FTE) | 16,500 | 8,250 |
Additional notes:
More to come with the upcoming release of Build Reuse's "Community Toolkit" report / tool!
For a visual representation of the materials that come from demolition:
Building deconstruction and reuse can be a strategy for disaster debris management. Below are several EPA resources on this topic.
EPA - Creating Disaster-Resilient Buildings to Minimize Disaster Debris (2024)
EPA - Resiliency and Natural Disaster Debris Workshop Final Summary Report (2022)
EPA - Sustainable Materials Management (SMM) Web Academy Webinar: After Disaster - Deconstruction, Rebuilding and Resilience Lessons from Hurricanes Katrina and Irene Webinar (2020)
Reuse increases materials lifespans, reduces dependency on scarce or non-renewable resources, reduces the amount of new procurement needed in building projects, and thereby can make construction projects less vulnerable to supply chain disruptions.
Reuse, especially when implemented at a local level, has the potential to make building materials more affordable.
Resources: