Build Reuse - General

Deconstruction Ordinances (Mandates) In-Progress

The following cities/regions are currently in the process of drafting policies that would mandate deconstruction for certain buildings. [Click city name to jump to the appropriate section on this page.]

Boston, MA

Baltimore, MD

Ithaca, NY

San Francisco, CA 

Hennepin County, MN 

Seattle, WA - [More info to be posted.]

Pittsburgh, PA - [More info to be posted.]

Policy/Program Name

Zero Waste Boston Deconstruction

City/Region

Boston, MA

Link: https://www.boston.gov/environment-and-energy/zero-waste-boston

Stated Motives

Sustainability goals, preserve historical and architectural character, growth of secondary material markets (alongside Massachusetts waste bans)

Boston has a growing secondary materials market, including reuse stores such as Boston Building Resources. The city is facing increasingly limited landfill and recycling process capacity.

Description

The City of Boston, driven largely through the efforts of Zero Waste Boston, is currently in the process of developing a deconstruction ordinance (along with the City of Cambridge, MA). 

In addition, Boston's Zoning code was amended in 1995 to include Article 85, a demolition delay policy to encourage other end-of-life options and public comment. Buildings subject to review include:

  • All buildings located in either Downtown or Harborpark
  • All buildings at least 50 years of age
  • All buildings located in a Neighbourhood Design Overlay District
  • Note that designated (landmarked) buildings are evaluated through a different process.

Boston, Cambridge, Newton, and other cities are rapidly developing whole building life-cycle assessment and embodied carbon regulations (such as Cambridge's recent Green New Deal).

Incentives

Potentially shorter timeline to receive deconstruction permit.

Policy/Program Name REBUILD Act
City/Region

Baltimore, MD

Link to ordinance draft:

Description of Drafted Policy
  • Motives for developing ordinance: Job opportunities, waste reduction, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, reducing blight, social equity, economic growth, human health (ex. lead poisoning), reduction in crime and recidivism
  • Entity drafting/proposing ordinance: Energy Justice Network, Clean Air Baltimore Coalition
  • As of January 2023, the bill is waiting to be heard by City Council
  • Looking to set minimum requirement of recovered materials for new buildings
Proposed Scope
  • Building type: Ordinance applies to homes and government buildings
  • Building age: Applies to buildings built 1970 or prior
  • Applicability to renovation: [Please post additional information.]
  • Exceptions/exemptions: 
    • Structures slated to be relocated
    • Structures that have been determined by the Department of Housing and community Development to be dangerous and requiring abatement by demolition
    • Any primary dwelling or business structure that the Director has determined is unsuitable for deconstruction because: a. The structure is structurally unsafe and not capable of stabilization, or is otherwise hazardous to human life; or b. At least 61% of the material in the structure is not suitable for reuse, as determined
Use of salvage assessment

Link to assessment: [Please post additional information.]

What happens to materials

Looking to develop a salvage-to-ADU (Accessory Dwelling Unit) program

Regional incentives for compliance
  • Looking to establish a temporary deconstruction fund
  • Looking to establish small business fund for salvaged materials
Penalties for non-compliance Significant increase to demolition fees, surcharge on landfilled C&D waste
Context of region
  • Baltimore has a 30 year history in deconstruction, thanks to several deconstruction/reuse organizations.
  • The city has already invested in several deconstruction projects
Additional notes

Policy/Program Name

[Please post additional information.]

City/Region

Ithaca, NY

Link to ordinance draft: [Please post additional information.]

Description of Drafted Policy
  • Motives for developing ordinance: Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, social equity, waste reduction, conservation of natural resources, worker health and safety, public health and safety (air quality, heavy metal soil leaching), job creation, lowering cost of waste management, historical preservation, sense of community
  • Entity drafting/proposing ordinance: CR0WD (Circularity, Reuse, Zero Waste Development) network
Proposed Scope
  • Building type: [Please post additional information.]
  • Building age: [Please post additional information.]
  • Applicability to renovation: [Please post additional information.]
  • Exceptions/exemptions: [Please post additional information.]
Use of salvage assessment

Link to assessment: [Please post additional information.]

What happens to materials [Please post additional information.]
Regional incentives for compliance Looking to support building owners in taking advantage of tax deductions from material donations
Penalties for non-compliance [Please post additional information.]
Context of region
  • Related policy/commitments/targets: Ithaca Green New Deal
    • The Ithaca Green New Deal aims for community-wide carbon neutraility by 2030, reduction in historical social and economic inequinitis, green building code for both new and existing buildings
  • Links: [Please post additional information.]
Additional notes

[Additional information to be posted]

Policy/Program Name

San Francisco construction and demolition debris recovery law

Link: https://www.sfenvironment.org/construction-demolition-requirements

City/Region

San Francisco, CA

Stated Motives Waste reduction
Description

"San Francisco Ordinance No. 144-21 and Public Works Code Section 725 add new construction and demolition (C&D) debris recovery requirements for C&D transporters, processing facilities, and projects. Under the ordinance, C&D debris material removed from a project in San Francisco must be recycled or reused. No C&D debris can be transported to or disposed of in a landfill or incinerator or put in a designated trash bin."

Additional notes

San Francisco Surplus Building Products Reduction and Redistribution Study (2021): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MnASDfOUaemAdG2EBUQNSF1cZeWvZaWt/view

Policy/Program Name

[Additional information to be posted]

City/Region

Hennepin County, MN

Stated Motives [Additional information to be posted]
Description

[Additional information to be posted]

Additional notes

 Athena Institute - Minnesota Demolition Survey (2004):

https://www.athenasmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Demolition_Survey.pdf

Deconstruction Ordinances (Mandates) In-Progress

The following cities/regions are currently in the process of drafting policies that would mandate deconstruction for certain buildings. [Click city name to jump to the appropriate section on this page.]

Boston, MA

Baltimore, MD

Ithaca, NY

San Francisco, CA 

Hennepin County, MN 

Seattle, WA - [More info to be posted.]

Pittsburgh, PA - [More info to be posted.]

Policy/Program Name

Zero Waste Boston Deconstruction

City/Region

Boston, MA

Link: https://www.boston.gov/environment-and-energy/zero-waste-boston

Stated Motives

Sustainability goals, preserve historical and architectural character, growth of secondary material markets (alongside Massachusetts waste bans)

Boston has a growing secondary materials market, including reuse stores such as Boston Building Resources. The city is facing increasingly limited landfill and recycling process capacity.

Description

The City of Boston, driven largely through the efforts of Zero Waste Boston, is currently in the process of developing a deconstruction ordinance (along with the City of Cambridge, MA). 

In addition, Boston's Zoning code was amended in 1995 to include Article 85, a demolition delay policy to encourage other end-of-life options and public comment. Buildings subject to review include:

  • All buildings located in either Downtown or Harborpark
  • All buildings at least 50 years of age
  • All buildings located in a Neighbourhood Design Overlay District
  • Note that designated (landmarked) buildings are evaluated through a different process.

Boston, Cambridge, Newton, and other cities are rapidly developing whole building life-cycle assessment and embodied carbon regulations (such as Cambridge's recent Green New Deal).

Incentives

Potentially shorter timeline to receive deconstruction permit.

Policy/Program Name REBUILD Act
City/Region

Baltimore, MD

Link to ordinance draft:

Description of Drafted Policy
  • Motives for developing ordinance: Job opportunities, waste reduction, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, reducing blight, social equity, economic growth, human health (ex. lead poisoning), reduction in crime and recidivism
  • Entity drafting/proposing ordinance: Energy Justice Network, Clean Air Baltimore Coalition
  • As of January 2023, the bill is waiting to be heard by City Council
  • Looking to set minimum requirement of recovered materials for new buildings
Proposed Scope
  • Building type: Ordinance applies to homes and government buildings
  • Building age: Applies to buildings built 1970 or prior
  • Applicability to renovation: [Please post additional information.]
  • Exceptions/exemptions: 
    • Structures slated to be relocated
    • Structures that have been determined by the Department of Housing and community Development to be dangerous and requiring abatement by demolition
    • Any primary dwelling or business structure that the Director has determined is unsuitable for deconstruction because: a. The structure is structurally unsafe and not capable of stabilization, or is otherwise hazardous to human life; or b. At least 61% of the material in the structure is not suitable for reuse, as determined
Use of salvage assessment

Link to assessment: [Please post additional information.]

What happens to materials

Looking to develop a salvage-to-ADU (Accessory Dwelling Unit) program

Regional incentives for compliance
  • Looking to establish a temporary deconstruction fund
  • Looking to establish small business fund for salvaged materials
Penalties for non-compliance Significant increase to demolition fees, surcharge on landfilled C&D waste
Context of region
  • Baltimore has a 30 year history in deconstruction, thanks to several deconstruction/reuse organizations.
  • The city has already invested in several deconstruction projects
Additional notes

Policy/Program Name

[Please post additional information.]

City/Region

Ithaca, NY

Link to ordinance draft: [Please post additional information.]

Description of Drafted Policy
  • Motives for developing ordinance: Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, social equity, waste reduction, conservation of natural resources, worker health and safety, public health and safety (air quality, heavy metal soil leaching), job creation, lowering cost of waste management, historical preservation, sense of community
  • Entity drafting/proposing ordinance: CR0WD (Circularity, Reuse, Zero Waste Development) network
Proposed Scope
  • Building type: [Please post additional information.]
  • Building age: [Please post additional information.]
  • Applicability to renovation: [Please post additional information.]
  • Exceptions/exemptions: [Please post additional information.]
Use of salvage assessment

Link to assessment: [Please post additional information.]

What happens to materials [Please post additional information.]
Regional incentives for compliance Looking to support building owners in taking advantage of tax deductions from material donations
Penalties for non-compliance [Please post additional information.]
Context of region
  • Related policy/commitments/targets: Ithaca Green New Deal
    • The Ithaca Green New Deal aims for community-wide carbon neutraility by 2030, reduction in historical social and economic inequinitis, green building code for both new and existing buildings
  • Links: [Please post additional information.]
Additional notes

[Additional information to be posted]

Policy/Program Name

San Francisco construction and demolition debris recovery law

Link: https://www.sfenvironment.org/construction-demolition-requirements

City/Region

San Francisco, CA

Stated Motives Waste reduction
Description

"San Francisco Ordinance No. 144-21 and Public Works Code Section 725 add new construction and demolition (C&D) debris recovery requirements for C&D transporters, processing facilities, and projects. Under the ordinance, C&D debris material removed from a project in San Francisco must be recycled or reused. No C&D debris can be transported to or disposed of in a landfill or incinerator or put in a designated trash bin."

Additional notes

San Francisco Surplus Building Products Reduction and Redistribution Study (2021): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MnASDfOUaemAdG2EBUQNSF1cZeWvZaWt/view

Policy/Program Name

[Additional information to be posted]

City/Region

Hennepin County, MN

Stated Motives [Additional information to be posted]
Description

[Additional information to be posted]

Additional notes

 Athena Institute - Minnesota Demolition Survey (2004):

https://www.athenasmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Demolition_Survey.pdf